Who this site is for

Doctor Scroll exists today for parents and families with children who scroll and need to understand what to look at, what to ask and where to get more context without alarmism. Here they will find the test, study cards and parental guides on scrolling and social media, always separating what is validated from what still has limits.

Validation Methodology

Each claim from the podcast was validated following a rigorous and systematic process to ensure the project's scientific integrity.

1
Claim extraction

Identify verifiable claims in the podcast

2
Scientific concept

Identify the underlying concept or mechanism

3
Literature search

Search peer-reviewed studies on PubMed/PMC

4
Quality assessment

Analyze methodology and effect size

5
Verdict

Assign level of support (✅/⚠️/❌)

6
Documentation

Record nuances, limitations and links

Project Principles

✅

Scientific Honesty

Prioritize scientific truth over an attractive narrative

🔍

Total Transparency

Show what is validated as well as what is refuted

📎

Citation Rigor

Direct links to PMC/PDF whenever possible

⚖️

Clear Nuances

Correlation ≠ causation, document limitations

🚫

No Alarmism

Do not exaggerate findings, contextualize risks

🧠

Critical Thinking

Question claims, even those from the podcast

🤖 AI Transparency

This project uses Artificial Intelligence tools in a transparent and ethical way. AI accelerates the work, but it does not invent data.

✓ What AI DOES

  • Transcription: The podcast was transcribed by Otter.ai
  • Search: Claude and ChatGPT helped find relevant studies
  • Organization: AI assistants structured and categorized information
  • Synthesis: AI helped summarize and extract key findings
  • Documentation: Creation of files and project structure

✗ What AI DOES NOT do

  • Invent studies: All studies are real and published
  • Modify data: Scientific findings were not altered
  • Create fake citations: All references are verifiable
  • Exaggerate findings: Nuances and limitations were preserved
  • Replace human judgment: Final interpretation is human

Source Verification

All sources cited in this project are real scientific studies published in peer-reviewed journals. You can verify each claim:

  • ✓ Direct links to PubMed Central (PMC)
  • ✓ Accessible PDFs of full studies
  • ✓ Verifiable DOI and PMID numbers
  • ✓ Publications in recognized journals

Our Commitment

"AI is an acceleration tool, not an invention tool. The science we present is 100% real. AI helped us find and organize it faster."

This is a non-profit educational project. All content is based on peer-reviewed scientific evidence.

Project Limitations

🔬 Correlation ≠ Causation

Most studies show correlation, not direct causation

👥 Individual Variability

Not all users are affected equally; genetic and environmental factors matter

📊 Effect Sizes

Some effects are moderate/small, not massive

🌍 Cultural Context

Many studies focus on Western/educated populations

Explore the Validations

See the 39 validated claims backed by scientific evidence

View Phase 1 →